Worst areas for bicycle theft

City of London in Greater London has the highest recorded rate of bicycle theft of the 306 local authority areas in England and Wales with a full year of data: 24.1 per 1,000 residents in the year to July 2026, against 0.8 nationally. It has 15,111 residents and 92,154 people in it on a working day, so that rate divides a city centre's crime by a village's population. Measured against the people actually there on a weekday, Cambridge comes top instead. On the resident measure, Cambridge, Oxford and Westminster come next. The 100 highest are listed below.

24.1 bicycle theft per 1,000 residents in City of London, the highest of 306 areas
0.8 per 1,000 across England and Wales
-7.2% national change on the previous 12 months
0.9% of all recorded crime is bicycle theft

This ranks recorded crime, not danger. A high position means the police recorded more bicycle theft per resident, which is not the same as a place being more dangerous to be in. Somewhere people report readily looks worse than somewhere people do not, and a district that fills with visitors carries their crime against the few who live there.

The 100 worst areas for bicycle theft

Ranked by recorded offences per 1,000 residents over the 12 months to July 2026, across 306 local authority areas: cities, towns and rural districts alike.

Worst areas for bicycle theft, by offences per 1,000 residents
# Area County Relative rate Per 1,000 Per 1,000 workday Offences Year on year Share of its crime
1 City of London Greater London 24.1 3.9 364 +49.2% 3.7%
2 Cambridge Cambridgeshire 6.0 5.3 891 -10.9% 5.4%
3 Oxford Oxfordshire 5.8 5.3 956 -6.3% 5.4%
4 Westminster Greater London 4.8 2.7 1,008 -0.1% 1.2%
5 Hackney Greater London 4.5 4.6 1,196 -9.7% 3.1%
6 Camden Greater London 3.9 2.9 841 -13.6% 1.8%
7 Islington Greater London 3.6 3.4 808 -10.9% 2.0%
8 Southwark Greater London 3.5 3.5 1,108 -1.2% 2.3%
9 Lambeth Greater London 3.3 3.2 1,030 +21.3% 2.1%
10 Tower Hamlets Greater London 3.2 3.1 1,045 -3.7% 2.2%
11 Hammersmith and Fulham Greater London 2.9 2.7 549 -8.5% 2.1%
12 Norwich Norfolk 2.7 2.6 400 +3.1% 2.2%
13 Kingston upon Hull East Riding of Yorkshire 2.4 2.5 671 +11.7% 1.8%
14 Lincoln Lincolnshire 2.4 2.4 256 +26.1% 1.6%
15 Reading Berkshire 2.4 2.5 441 -5.0% 2.2%
16 Kensington and Chelsea Greater London 2.3 1.8 329 -12.3% 1.3%
17 Wandsworth Greater London 2.1 2.2 720 +27.9% 2.2%
18 Cardiff South Glamorgan 2.1 2.1 808 -9.5% 1.9%
19 Exeter Devon 2.1 2.0 290 +50.3% 1.9%
20 Bristol Bristol 2.1 2.1 1,013 -0.9% 1.4%
21 Portsmouth Hampshire 2.0 2.0 419 -15.7% 1.6%
22 Boston Lincolnshire 1.8 1.9 131 -13.3% 1.7%
23 Nottingham Nottinghamshire 1.8 1.7 584 +8.6% 1.1%
24 Richmond upon Thames Greater London 1.7 1.7 342 -28.8% 2.4%
25 North East Lincolnshire Lincolnshire 1.7 1.7 269 -3.6% 1.2%
26 Watford Hertfordshire 1.7 1.7 180 +5.9% 1.5%
27 Slough Berkshire 1.6 1.7 269 +22.8% 1.6%
28 Kingston upon Thames Greater London 1.6 1.6 277 -9.2% 1.9%
29 Harlow Essex 1.6 1.7 154 +58.8% 1.4%
30 Leicester Leicestershire 1.6 1.6 600 -27.6% 1.3%
31 Worcester Worcestershire 1.5 1.6 162 -16.9% 1.4%
32 Welwyn Hatfield Hertfordshire 1.5 1.4 182 -7.6% 1.5%
33 Newham Greater London 1.5 1.6 548 +2.6% 1.1%
34 Brighton and Hove East Sussex 1.4 1.4 392 -21.1% 1.1%
35 Hounslow Greater London 1.4 1.5 413 -16.9% 1.3%
36 Preston Lancashire 1.4 1.4 225 -19.4% 1.1%
37 Southampton Hampshire 1.4 1.5 358 -15.0% 1.1%
38 Coventry West Midlands 1.4 1.5 505 -0.8% 1.4%
39 Peterborough Cambridgeshire 1.4 1.4 307 -8.4% 1.1%
40 Stevenage Hertfordshire 1.4 1.4 124 +42.5% 1.2%
41 Worthing West Sussex 1.3 1.4 152 +7.8% 1.3%
42 Stafford Staffordshire 1.3 1.4 186 +100.0% 1.6%
43 Waltham Forest Greater London 1.3 1.4 356 -16.6% 1.2%
44 Haringey Greater London 1.2 1.3 324 +18.3% 0.9%
45 Liverpool Merseyside 1.2 1.2 626 +17.5% 0.9%
46 Windsor and Maidenhead Berkshire 1.2 1.2 189 -1.6% 1.8%
47 Colchester Essex 1.2 1.2 236 -26.3% 1.3%
48 Warwick Warwickshire 1.2 1.1 182 +31.9% 1.4%
49 Lancaster Lancashire 1.2 1.2 169 -0.6% 1.2%
50 Newcastle upon Tyne Tyne and Wear 1.2 1.2 375 -5.1% 1.0%
51 Southend-on-Sea Essex 1.2 1.2 216 +1.9% 1.0%
52 Bedford Bedfordshire 1.2 1.2 224 -20.3% 1.2%
53 Leeds West Yorkshire 1.2 1.2 970 +9.6% 0.9%
54 Lewisham Greater London 1.1 1.2 344 -0.3% 0.9%
55 Stoke-on-Trent Staffordshire 1.1 1.2 308 +30.5% 0.8%
56 Canterbury Kent 1.1 1.1 178 +6.0% 1.0%
57 Eastbourne East Sussex 1.1 1.1 115 +1.8% 0.8%
58 Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Dorset 1.1 1.1 447 -10.6% 1.3%
59 Ipswich Suffolk 1.1 1.1 152 -7.3% 1.1%
60 Merton Greater London 1.1 1.1 232 +8.9% 1.4%
61 Blackpool Lancashire 1.0 1.0 150 +4.2% 0.6%
62 Darlington County Durham 1.0 1.1 117 +10.4% 0.8%
63 Charnwood Leicestershire 1.0 1.1 193 +17.0% 1.3%
64 Middlesbrough North Yorkshire 1.0 1.1 160 -13.0% 0.6%
65 Gosport Hampshire 1.0 1.1 81 -2.4% 1.2%
66 Ealing Greater London 0.9 1.0 359 -20.8% 0.8%
67 Carlisle Cumbria 0.9 0.9 105 -8.7% 0.9%
68 Derby Derbyshire 0.9 0.9 246 -5.8% 0.7%
69 Woking Surrey 0.9 0.9 95 +11.8% 1.2%
70 Warrington Cheshire 0.9 0.9 192 -9.9% 1.2%
71 Chichester West Sussex 0.9 0.9 114 -15.6% 1.1%
72 Epsom and Ewell Surrey 0.9 0.9 73 -2.7% 1.0%
73 Hastings East Sussex 0.9 0.9 80 +11.1% 0.6%
74 North Lincolnshire Lincolnshire 0.9 0.9 151 +26.9% 0.9%
75 Greenwich Greater London 0.9 0.9 260 -19.0% 0.8%
76 Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire 0.9 0.9 266 -16.1% 0.9%
77 Newark and Sherwood Nottinghamshire 0.9 0.9 110 -28.6% 1.0%
78 Denbighshire Clwyd 0.9 0.9 83 +59.6% 0.8%
79 Bracknell Forest Berkshire 0.8 0.9 110 -13.4% 1.3%
80 Somerset West and Taunton Somerset 0.8 0.8 135 +53.4% 0.9%
81 Swindon Wiltshire 0.8 0.9 200 -23.1% 1.0%
82 Brent Greater London 0.8 0.9 287 -2.1% 0.7%
83 Hartlepool County Durham 0.8 0.9 80 -2.4% 0.5%
84 Broxtowe Nottinghamshire 0.8 0.9 92 +31.4% 1.0%
85 Arun West Sussex 0.8 0.9 135 -14.6% 0.9%
86 Burnley Lancashire 0.8 0.8 78 +4.0% 0.6%
87 St Albans Hertfordshire 0.8 0.8 119 -9.9% 1.0%
88 Sedgemoor Somerset 0.8 0.8 102 +25.9% 0.7%
89 Guildford Surrey 0.8 0.8 115 -22.3% 0.9%
90 Thurrock Essex 0.8 0.8 137 +42.7% 0.8%
91 Doncaster South Yorkshire 0.8 0.8 241 +6.6% 0.6%
92 Hillingdon Greater London 0.8 0.8 248 +4.2% 0.6%
93 South Cambridgeshire Cambridgeshire 0.8 0.8 130 +10.2% 1.3%
94 Cherwell Oxfordshire 0.7 0.8 126 +17.8% 1.0%
95 Rushmoor Hampshire 0.7 0.8 78 +36.8% 1.0%
96 Barrow-in-Furness Cumbria 0.7 0.7 50 +8.7% 0.7%
97 Great Yarmouth Norfolk 0.7 0.8 73 -34.2% 0.7%
98 Medway Kent 0.7 0.8 214 +0.5% 0.7%
99 Ashford Kent 0.7 0.8 101 +42.3% 0.9%
100 Wolverhampton West Midlands 0.7 0.8 201 -5.2% 0.7%

The table stops at 100, by which point the rate has fallen from 24.1 per 1,000 to 0.7. The other 206 areas carry the same figure for bicycle theft on their own pages: search for a place by name, or see all 306 areas ranked by overall crime.

The first rate divides recorded offences by resident population, which is what the Office for National Statistics publishes. The second divides the same offences by the Census 2021 working-day population, which counts the people who are actually there on a weekday rather than the ones who sleep there. In this top ten, City of London and Westminster each fall by more than a third once the same offences are divided by the working-day population instead of the resident one, which is the signature of a place that fills up by day and empties at night.

The last column is this category's share of all crime recorded in that same area. A high rate with an ordinary share is a busy place; a high rate with an unusually high share is a place with a particular problem, and the two are worth telling apart.

What counts as bicycle theft

The Home Office publishes this as a single category, Bicycle theft, covering taking a pedal cycle without consent. It follows cycling: university cities and flat commuter towns come top because that is where the bikes are, not because they are lawless. It is what most people mean by bike theft.

Across England and Wales, police recorded 48,051 of them in the year to July 2026: 0.9% of all recorded crime, 7.2% down on the year before.

Areas are local authority districts, the level England and Wales actually publishes boundaries and populations for. A further 24 districts are left out because their police force has not filed a full year of returns; shown with a partial year, they would sit near the bottom of the table looking safe. How the figures work sets out the method, data sources lists where the numbers come from.

Where each offence peaks

City of London tops 9 of the 13 categories, and between them the 13 are led by only 4 different areas. That is what dividing by residents does: a place whose daytime crowds dwarf the people who live there wins almost everything, whatever the offence. Ordered by how much of all recorded crime each one accounts for, so the largest categories come first.

Every offence category, the area with the highest rate, and the size of the category
Offence Led by Rate there England and Wales Share of all crime
Violence City of London 99.3 32.4 35.5%
Anti-social behaviour Westminster 64.2 14.5 15.9%
Shoplifting City of London 108.1 7.8 8.6%
Criminal damage City of London 19.8 6.4 7.0%
Public order City of London 41.6 6.3 6.9%
Other theft City of London 158.5 6.1 6.6%
Vehicle crime Kensington and Chelsea 14.4 4.7 5.1%
Burglary City of London 31.4 3.3 3.7%
Drug offences City of London 30.5 3.1 3.4%
Theft from the person Westminster 85.0 1.6 1.8%
Robbery City of London 20.2 1.3 1.4%
Weapons Crawley 6.1 0.9 1.0%
Bicycle theft (this page) City of London 24.1 0.8 0.9%

Rates are per 1,000 residents over the 12 months to July 2026, across the same 306 areas. For crime as a whole rather than one category, see highest crime rates and safest places to live.