Colchester vs Epping Forest

Epping Forest records less crime for its size than Colchester: 75.6 offences per 1,000 residents in the 12 months to June 2026, against 92.8. That is about 23% more. Both figures are averages across a whole local authority, and neither area is uniform: the gap between neighbourhoods inside one of these places is usually wider than the gap between the two of them.

Colchester 92.8 crimes per 1,000 residents, Essex
Epping Forest 75.6 crimes per 1,000 residents, Essex

The England and Wales average is 91.2 recorded crimes per 1,000 residents. Colchester is close to it. Epping Forest is about 17% below it.

Side by side

Recorded crime in Colchester and Epping Forest
  Colchester Epping Forest
Crimes per 1,000 residents 92.8 75.6
Offences in the year to June 2026 18,570 10,385
Residents 200,222 137,451
Change on the previous 12 months +6.0% +1.0%
Rank in England and Wales 124 of 314 204 of 314

Rank 1 is the highest recorded rate. Both areas are local authority areas, so the two populations are counted the same way and the rates are directly comparable.

Offence by offence

The mix differs more than the totals do. Colchester records about 1.7 times as much shoplifting, 1.4 times as much violence and sexual offences and 1.4 times as much possession of weapons per resident. Epping Forest records about 1.5 times as much drugs and 1.4 times as much vehicle crime per resident.

Rate per 1,000 residents by offence
Offence, per 1,000 residents Colchester Epping Forest
Violence and sexual offences 40.4 28.4
Anti-social behaviour 9.2 7.2
Shoplifting 8.4 5.1
Vehicle crime 5.5 7.9
Criminal damage and arson 6.3 6.2
Public order 6.5 5.4
Other theft 5.8 4.9
Drugs 2.5 3.7
Burglary 2.8 3.3
Other crime 1.7 1.5
Robbery 1.0 0.8
Bicycle theft 1.3 0.2
Possession of weapons 0.8 0.6
Theft from the person 0.5 0.5
All recorded crime 92.8 75.6

Both places since 2011

Each line is a rolling twelve-month rate per 1,000 residents, so seasonality is taken out and the two areas are on the same scale despite their different sizes.

Colchester Epping Forest
3060901200Covid lockdown93 Colchester76 Epping20122014201620182020202220242026
A line breaks wherever the twelve months behind it include a return the force never filed, because a twelve-month total missing three of its months is not a total.

Questions

Is Colchester safer than Epping Forest?

Epping Forest records less crime for its size than Colchester: 75.6 offences per 1,000 residents in the 12 months to June 2026, against 92.8. That is about 23% more. Both figures are averages across a whole local authority, and neither area is uniform: the gap between neighbourhoods inside one of these places is usually wider than the gap between the two of them.

What does this comparison not tell you?

Recorded crime counts what the police wrote down, so a place where people report more looks worse than a place where they report less, whatever actually happened. Both figures are averages across a whole local authority: a town with one busy centre and quiet suburbs carries a rate that describes neither. And the denominator is residents, so somewhere that fills up with commuters, students or shoppers by day records crime against a population it is not credited with. How the figures work sets all of this out.

Where else can I compare?

Pick any other two areas, or start from Colchester or Epping Forest and use the neighbouring areas listed on each. The ranked lists of the safest places and the highest crime rates cover all of them at once.

Figures cover the 12 months to June 2026. Police data is published roughly two months in arrears.